God Emperor of Mastodon (new account)

@michal@sapka.pl

This is my new, future account. While most interaction still happen on the bsd.cafe one, I aim to migrate fully here.

I am posting mostly culture, emacs, bsd and anti-ai based ramblings. I don't curse and I try not bait people into pointless anger rages.

I am a nerd (or dork? I don't know), a software engineer and I started to hate what technology has bacame.

This is a self-hosted, single-user instance running on snac2.

Messages auto deleted every few weeks
Homepagehttps://michal.sapka.pl

339 following, 862 followers

4 ★ 2 ↺
zeb mim 🍷 boosted

[?]God Emperor of Mastodon (new account) » 🌐
@michal@sapka.pl

I'm starting to think that LLMs may be better for the web. Not the corporate, espionage one - this one is pretty much dead. But for small web. A huge part of it are blogs written by tech people for tech people. They tend to be boring academic. They give recipes or technical deep dive. This has is very important place in their own context, but this is not the web I grew up with. And those articles become mostly useless. If it's something highly niche - sure. But for something generic? You can get the same soulless explanation from an LLM, just with better grammar. I see this in my reviews - an LLM could have written them better. Currently I don't feel any itch to write anything like this or to read things like this.

But there are also articles only the author could have written. Ones that come from personal experience, ones written in their distinct style. It's no longer "how to do this thing" or "how is this thing". Again, I feel no need to write them. What I want to write is things about me - so the shift to "how did I that thing". A more personal web. Ruben has his style (which is a 4 letter sentence), Tim has an amazing intro on how to use Mail, and so on. Those sites and texts are distinctly their. I hope there will be less orange-site style texts written, which you could copy to any other site (or even yahoo) and not even notice. More MWL, less O'Reily.

As a complete side note: I try to write better technically.

...

[?]Andreas (82MHz) » 🌐
@82mhz@mastodon.bsd.cafe

@michal
Very well said! 👍

    [?]bpl » 🌐
    @bpl@snac.bsd.cafe

    Well, I cannot see how LLMs will make writers being more personal, less academic. If someone has their style, they will not change it because of increasing LLMs usage. And even if their writing is boring, the fact that they described something means that at least they had to think for a second about it or even execute on their machine. LLM has no experience with things which it plucks out.

    IMHO "small web" will become more hermetized (due to decreasing interest in reading and learning) and more exotic. And I do not think that this will encourage people to write more, whom they will be writing to?

      ...
      0 ★ 0 ↺

      [?]God Emperor of Mastodon (new account) » 🌐
      @michal@sapka.pl

      The problem was with "how much" was never not about needing to write more. I think there should be less words written. Especially now, when they can be generated in any volume. But the smaller number of non-discouraged writers may make the overall quality better. SEO is dead, monetizing blog as "content" as well. Most incentives to write mediocre articles is gone. You need to enjoy to publish for the process of publishing.

      ...

      [?]bpl » 🌐
      @bpl@snac.bsd.cafe

      Agreed, no doubts that quality will go in pair with current changes. My anxiety concerns availability - if there will be less people interested in distributing knowledge, then it will be harder to find it. Here LLMs do not help at all - if one has a choice to get answer quickly (if it is correct is another story, but answer sounds plausible), then one will have no big interest in spending more time on searching through blogs or similar places.

        History