God Emperor of Mastodon (new account)
@michal@sapka.pl
341 following, 904 followers
Re. No theft: They must still be trained on vast quantities of text, in order to 'understand' the input, even if they output JSON rather than human language. I doubt their training corpus is much more ethical than those used for LLMs?
Re. No hallucinations: They could still hallucinate things or be influenced in weird ways from things in the input, affecting the decision output. And then you're left with just black box decisions, without any record of why they were reached.
@michal I forget who said it, but "AI companies are spending billions to make millions." And they want more investment.
This will end badly. Just like Tulip Mania, the South Seas Bubble, and all delusions throughout history.
@michal When you lose 42 billion and still Reuters writes about your "sweeping vision", that's quite a success in my book.
I get that this is a marketing stunt, but what does it tell about us? It works, apparently. Someone should nuke Sillican Valley.
I put my Synology in a locked cabinet. So far the hottest HDD is at 42°C. ;)
If this goes well, I may not need to add extra fan ;p
@michal Why would it be dumb? Maybe not cost effective.
@michal it's a cable, make sure you get the stranded (as opposed to solid) variety so it's nice and flexible.
Unless you're planning 10Gbps+ you probably need cat 5e though.
I am shocked! "Shocked," I say. I would never have thought that they have a mechanism to ban an ad.
@michal exactly. They could've blocked all those ads for scams, pyramid schemes, fake AI politicians endorsing various grifts. They just didn't want to, I guess, for some reason.
another git push/pull questionl: how do you usually set an upstream for branches that you create? you can pick more than one
(also I really appreciate everyone answering all these polls, I hope it is fun for you)
| With `git push -u` (aka --set-upstream): | 682 |
| With the config option `push.autoSetupRemote=true`: | 324 |
| With `git branch --set-upstream-to=`: | 183 |
| Other: | 128 |
Closed
@b0rk I usually don't set a default upstream, and just specify where I want to push each time I push something. Otherwise I would end up accidentally pushing my work in progress interal branches to someone else's repository
@b0rk whatever magit does 😅
@tusharhero i'm curious about what magit does!
@b0rk @tusharhero Same answer for me.
And magit prompts you to do `--set-upstream` if you don't have an upstream set: https://github.com/magit/magit/blob/main/lisp/magit-push.el#L131-L173
@unlambda @b0rk @tusharhero While that is convenient if the upstream is unset for some reason,
I recommend you configure Git to (almost) always set it up when the branch is created, by doing this once: git config set --global branch.autoSetupMerge always
@unlambda @b0rk @tusharhero IMO it usually is not a good idea to treat "some-remote/some-feature" as the *upstream* of "some-feature". It's upstream should be something like "main" or "origin/main".
I recommend you push "some-feature" to "some-remote/some-feature" using "p p" instead of "p u". (That also remembers the target, but in this case not the "upstream" but the "push target".)
See https://docs.magit.vc/magit/Branching.html#The-Two-Remotes-1
@tarsius @unlambda @b0rk @tusharhero this specific article from magit about how git functions really helped crystallize git's actual design in my mind. Thank you for writing it.
usually the `git push -u` because that's what git instructs me *right there* in the error message when I try to push a branch that lacks an upstream.
However, if I *remember* and know ahead of time, I'll edit my .git/config and manually create the branch/remote/upstream linkage just to avoid having git yell at me (and because I never remember the `push -u` syntax until it does yell at me, but I can easily see the pattern in the config file)
I may or may not want to write about that. From one point of view, I have my opinions. On the other hand, do I really want to participate?
New rule at BSD Cafe: Do not promote AI
BSD Cafe prefers to define itself by what it supports, rather than by what it opposes.
We support people, open technologies, decentralisation, technological independence, privacy, user control, the sharing of knowledge, and communities where technology remains a tool rather than becoming the authority.
For these reasons, we cannot support the current direction of AI and the ecosystem surrounding it.
Much of today's AI technology is developed and controlled by a very small number of extremely large companies, through an unprecedented concentration of computing power, data, infrastructure, and capital. This creates dependencies that are fundamentally at odds with many of the values this community was built around.
We are also seeing increasingly direct consequences for people. Skilled professionals are losing work to automated systems. Organisations are becoming dependent on services they cannot inspect, understand, or control. AI-generated technical advice is often presented with confidence while lacking essential context. Automation is being used to scale abuse, manipulation, spam, and attacks.
At the same time, fear of these threats can itself push people and organisations towards a handful of large centralised providers, further reinforcing the same concentration of power.
The problem is not simply the existence of artificial intelligence as a technology. The problem is how these technologies are currently being developed, deployed, controlled, marketed, and increasingly presented as an inevitable replacement for human skills, judgement, creativity, and interaction.
Too often, the message coming from the companies selling these systems is essentially: *this is inevitable, it will replace what you do, and you will have to adapt to it whether you want to or not.*
At the BSD Cafe, we believe there must always be another choice.
For this reason, we ask members **not to use BSD Cafe to promote, advertise, or evangelise AI services, or the idea that replacing human work and decision-making with AI is inherently desirable, inevitable, or something everyone should simply accept.**
This does not prevent discussion.
But please do not use this community to promote the current AI-driven model of technological centralisation and human replacement.
**"Own your data" and the current state of AI are simply not compatible.**
@announcements Hi, I know the answer to my question likely requires only one web search, but humans have always been better pointers.
Which documentation and resources would you recommend to someone who has never installed or even played with BSD?
Which distro is more beginner-friendly?
I have average Linux knowledge (Debian and Debian-based). I wouldn't called it advanced but I have been using it for 20 years without major issues. The command line doesn't scare me either.
@announcements then why is your avatar and profile background generated?
@hbons There is something that only a couple of friends know, and I think it is time to make it public. At the beginning of the project, a few people wanted to contribute some images.
One of them was an artist who, unfortunately, has had their ability to create content severely limited by a degenerative illness. When they sent me their work, I felt that the human value of making this person feel useful again outweighed the risk that some of the content might have been, or might possibly have been, generated or assisted by AI. It was early 2023.
There was already some controversy about this some time ago, and this person eventually left the Fediverse altogether. Although they were not attacked directly, they felt attacked.
I have changed the images to avoid any further issues. But this is exactly why I believe witch hunts do not get us very far: the AI gurus keep using and abusing these tools to make money in ways I consider unethical, while this person, who for a while had felt useful again, has fallen back into their (semi-)isolation.
@announcements @hbons This is very sweet and sad. 💔
@coreysnipes @announcements @hbons this is one of the reasons why we want to promote positivity. It's full of people having problems, full of people living bad lives. We don't want to deny this. But, when here, we want to make sure they can have a good time, feel among friends without continuously having to fight wars.
@announcements thanks for the clarification and hope they’re doing well.
@hbons @announcements unfortunately, the physical conditions won't improve. But their mood is good enough and we kept in touch.
@announcements @hbons Bruh the new one is AI-generated too 😭
@announcements @hbons Yes it is lol. What kind of idiot do you take me for?
@announcements @hbons Oh yeah, sure, I guess the poorly done cropping on a supposedly vectorized drawing, the oversaturated colors, the cup having two handles and steam coming from one of them, and the misaligned text are all just aesthetic choices, right? I'm sorry but if you seriously think a human made this you've been scammed.
@Luna @hbons Since this is now a public accusation, I want to clarify a few things.
The cropping was done by me, manually, from the original image. It was not part of the original artwork, so using that as evidence that the image was AI-generated does not really make sense. It's all my fault 😉
About the "two handles": there is one handle, on the right. The shape on the left is part of the little devil, partially visible behind the cup. The little devil is deliberately a bit clumsy, so parts of it stick out where perhaps a professional designer would have hidden or cleaned them up. But it's a deliberate choice.
The same applies to the two "steam" shapes. One is the steam from the coffee, the other is part of the visual joke around the devil being hot. You can absolutely dislike the idea, or think it does not work visually, but that is very different from proving that it was generated by AI.
The colours are intentional. And yes, the text is not perfectly aligned, some shapes are rough, and the composition is not perfect. But this was never presented as a polished corporate logo made by a professional design studio.
What I find unfair is turning all these imperfections into "proof" that the image was AI-generated.
You can say that it looks AI-generated to you. You can say that you do not like it, or that some parts look odd. That is completely fair.
But saying that anyone who believes a human made it "has been scammed" is a much stronger accusation, and I do not think the points you listed support that conclusion.
@announcements @hbons The original artwork a.k.a. the image that ChatGPT made. I don't know what is sadder, the pathetic attempt for an excuse or the fact that people will believe this bullshit. I'm not asking for a corporate logo, just one drawn by yourselves you lazy liars.
@feld @announcements @hbons That person, the one who created the images, asked me to remove them.
I tried to convince them everything was fine, but this person was clear enough: "you can't use them anymore".
As you know, I protect the community even when I'm attacked personally. This happens quite often. But I can't force people to leave their work online, if they don't want to.
About the random internet strangers: if I had to change something about the Cafe every time a random stranger pops in and complains, I'd have to change it multiple times a day 😆
@feld @announcements @hbons sad, yes. But, since then, many things have changed, in many different procedures and policies.
is talking about having used ai/llm based tools or services and having gotten a „good“
result (however that is defined pr perceived) considered promotion or discussion?
@lazyb0y discussion is ok. Saying "I tried it and the result was good" is still a discussion. Sustaining that that's the way to do stuff is promoting.
In general, the topic isn't banned. The suggestion of using those tools isn't appreciated, especially if we're talking about closed, commercial and unethical solutions.
@announcements Question: Can I use this space to ask about developing/deploying/operating LLM and alike locally? Or in a self-hosted way?
Another question: does this include other technologies adjacent to it, like machine-learning? Like Discussing OpenCV or running machine-translations with Weblate, etc.
I understood that we shouldn't use this space to promote monthly subscriptions to a proprietary black-box in someone else's server. But can we talk here about the black-box if it's (semi)open and running locally?
@release_candidate sure. The topic isn't banned. The underneath technology is still technology, and we're passionate about technology. Promoting closed, unethical products from closed, unethical companies is another thing.
why am I the only one who thinks it odd to oppose ai cause " controlled by a very small number of extremely large companies "
and at the same time not be opposed to using computer chips made by Intel/TSCM/AMD ?
how on earth are the two techs different ?
@failedLyndonLaRouchite Your observation is fair. But I think there's an important difference: when you buy an Intel or AMD chip, even if it was manufactured by TSMC, you own it. You can install the OS you want and use it however you like.
When you use *their* AI, you don't own the model, the infrastructure, or the service. You're trading some of your freedom and control for convenience.
And to me, it's the same problem you have with proprietary SaaS running in someone else's cloud: you pay for a service for as long as they decide to provide it, and you give up practical control over your data, even if the terms of service tell you that you still "own" it.
That's the distinction I'm making here, and that's why I'm asking people not to promote that model at the BSD Cafe.
The first rule of BSD Cafe is: we do NOT talk about AI.
@jerrej not exactly. You can talk about AI. But, please, do not promote its use, especially if it brings people to use closed, proprietary technologies.
It's not a strict anti-AI policy. It's a "do not promote AI" - considering the current trend around it - which is quite different.
@announcements @jerrej seems to me people often see blurry line between promotion and discussion.
as you know i research ai quite a bit. even wrote agentic tooling and mcps to diagnose jail/bhyve systems on freebsd. talking about what you're working on sometimes is misinterpreted as promotion. several occasions i received negative comments for openly talking about research. i didn't bother you with it since it was petty at best, bargain basement at worst.
found out others in the community use it but rarely discuss due to it being too confrontational. we all talk in private groups now (peaceful and less noise).
(ramble end...)
you've got a nice place and ive always valued our interactions. at the end of the day its you're cafe and we're all drinking the cofe. i hope whatever cycle of this assumed turmoil passes for you soon.
whether you like ai or are a hardened purist, you've always been fair and kind with me even when we disagree. please don't change.
cat for scale.
@jae @announcements @jerrej Don't worry, nothing will change. There's a specific reason why I decided to add that rule, but I'd rather not disclose it publicly (yet).
@stefano farewell.
I enjoyed the ride.
I discovered the rule whilst reporting an anti-AI toot that threatened to stab people in the face.
I hope that personal notes are included when migrating.
@grahamperrin the rule is against *promoting* AI (especially closed, proprietary AI) at BSD Cafe. I cannot control what other instances post, and reporting them is absolutely the right thing to do. And the offending user has been suspended, here.
I hope you're not leaving for that. I'd be quite sad.
@grahamperrin PS: for a complete idea of the ratio behind that rule, please have a look here: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@announcements/117330611544443146
New rule at BSD Cafe: Do not promote AI
BSD Cafe prefers to define itself by what it supports, rather than by what it opposes.
We support people, open technologies, decentralisation, technological independence, privacy, user control, the sharing of knowledge, and communities where technology remains a tool rather than becoming the authority.
For these reasons, we cannot support the current direction of AI and the ecosystem surrounding it.
Much of today's AI technology is developed and controlled by a very small number of extremely large companies, through an unprecedented concentration of computing power, data, infrastructure, and capital. This creates dependencies that are fundamentally at odds with many of the values this community was built around.
We are also seeing increasingly direct consequences for people. Skilled professionals are losing work to automated systems. Organisations are becoming dependent on services they cannot inspect, understand, or control. AI-generated technical advice is often presented with confidence while lacking essential context. Automation is being used to scale abuse, manipulation, spam, and attacks.
At the same time, fear of these threats can itself push people and organisations towards a handful of large centralised providers, further reinforcing the same concentration of power.
The problem is not simply the existence of artificial intelligence as a technology. The problem is how these technologies are currently being developed, deployed, controlled, marketed, and increasingly presented as an inevitable replacement for human skills, judgement, creativity, and interaction.
Too often, the message coming from the companies selling these systems is essentially: *this is inevitable, it will replace what you do, and you will have to adapt to it whether you want to or not.*
At the BSD Cafe, we believe there must always be another choice.
For this reason, we ask members **not to use BSD Cafe to promote, advertise, or evangelise AI services, or the idea that replacing human work and decision-making with AI is inherently desirable, inevitable, or something everyone should simply accept.**
This does not prevent discussion.
But please do not use this community to promote the current AI-driven model of technological centralisation and human replacement.
**"Own your data" and the current state of AI are simply not compatible.**
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/117198977438025325
I can quote this post from three weeks ago. Key point:
"Farewell to the Fediverse that failed, the one that's abnormally cohesive."
Whilst I can quote, I can not elaborate without breaking the new rule.
Farewell.
RE: https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@grahamperrin/117197654600279594
Protestors pushed me too far ― repeatedly ― over a period of around eighteen months.
Incidents on 30th and 31st August 2026 pushed me too far, in ways that citizens of a normal community can not possibly imagine.
People sometimes randomly complain that Reddit is a cesspit.
The citizens of the Fediverse have ― as a horde ― successfully federated to create a global community that is worse than I ever predicted. Worse than any combination of X + Truth Social. It's not a normal community.
It's abnormal.
Now I understand why Reddit, Inc. began using the word "community" instead of "subreddit". Reddit has features ― some obscure, some not ― that permit a community to flourish.
Flourish, without overall degradation from protestors who imagine that their individual and collective voices are always acceptable in any situation that suits them.
A Fediverse that lacks comparable subsections has failed me.
On 1st September, I used a feature of Mastodon to begin elevating a concept that is not normally associated with Mastodon:
― guard rails.
I enjoy this newly guarded, assisted Fediverse, in a way that pleases me, and should please other people.
It's probably fair to say that the era of me encouraging people to use Mastodon has ended.
Farewell to the Fediverse that failed, the one that's abnormally cohesive.
Welcome to a guarded Fediverse that has a greater possibility of winning.
#AI #Fediverse #guardrails #Mastodon
@grahamperrin OK. I understand your point.
The rule exists partly because we've had an almost endless stream of bots, malicious users, and similar accounts lately, to the point that I've had to restrict registrations even further. The intention is not to police opinions, but to prevent this kind of behaviour from making the Cafe a worse place for the people who are here.
There is also so much money circulating around AI right now that some people, or bots, are actively trying to get into communities like ours and subtly promote their paid services. Sometimes it is obvious, sometimes much less so. That is one of the concrete reasons that led to this rule in the first place.
And just to be clear about the report you mentioned: threatening to stab someone in the face is obviously not acceptable here. That user was not on BSD Cafe, but on another instance, so I cannot enforce our rules there. What I can do, and what I did, is suspend that user's interactions with our server. Violence is not accepted here, whether it comes from inside BSD Cafe or from outside.
There are also other circumstances, which I won't go into again, that made me think that asking people not to *promote* AI is a reasonable way to protect the atmosphere of this community.
That doesn't mean people cannot talk about AI, disagree with the rule, criticise it, discuss its benefits, or have completely different opinions from mine.
What I want to avoid is every discussion turning into another occasion to repeat that AI will save the world, computing, humanity, or that replacing human skills with it is simply inevitable and everyone should accept it.
Until these technologies can be used in ways that are genuinely ethical, safe, transparent, and autonomous, I don't see promoting their current ecosystem as very different from promoting closed technologies and dependencies that can potentially cause harm.
So, for me, the rule is not against the technology itself. It is about how that technology is currently being developed, promoted, and used, and especially about the idea that it should be pushed everywhere, often at the expense of human skills and judgement.
I would genuinely be sorry to see you leave, but if this is not compatible with what you want from an instance, then of course I respect your choice.
With respect, you can not understand my point, because I refrained from making the point that I want to make.
In May 2024 I began wondering about a second 'home' (alongside BSD Cafe as a first home). Much thought, over a very long period – I didn't made a final decision until January 2026.
The eight months there (and here and elsewhere) have helped to reshape my thoughts about what it means to be engaged; what makes an instance a community; and so on.
I don't doubt that the intention of the new rule is good, but the essence of the rule – "Do not promote AI" – repels me.
Incidentally, whilst the stabbing post was not serious (I haven't lost my sense of humour), it was a suitably thought-provoking path to discovery of the new rule.
None of what's above is the point.
@grahamperrin That's fair. You're right: I can't understand a point you deliberately haven't made, and I shouldn't pretend that I do.
I was responding to what I thought your concern might be, and explaining why the rule exists. But if that isn't the point, then I won't try to guess what it is.
You are absolutely free to make that point, including if it is a criticism of the rule or of my decision to introduce it. Disagreement with the rule is not against the rule.
And if you'd rather not elaborate, I respect that too.
I still genuinely regret seeing you leave, but I don't want to turn this into an attempt to convince you to stay.
Export personal notes (private notes), for account migration and other purposes · Issue #40715 · mastodon/mastodon
https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/40715
Related, but not mentioned in 40715, a feature that was originally suggested nine years ago:
Add optional Reason field to block dialog · Issue #38641
@jae ten hours ago, <https://discuss.kde.org/t/kde-and-ai-and-you-and-me/50404/44?u=grahamperrin> Nate Graham wrote:
"Discussing ethics requires nuance and tact to avoid everyone ending up accusing everyone else of being unethical for this, that, and the other thing.
Frankly, I don’t think very many these days are capable of doing it for a topic as charged as AI.
I see Paul has closed the thread. Probably for the best at this point.
I have a recommendation for everyone: in the future, either don’t discuss the ethical dimensions of the topic, or do it only with an extraordinary amount of empathy for diversity of opinions and value judgments. Anything else is just gonna devolve into negativity and broken relationships."
The companion blog post – <https://pointieststick.com/2026/09/23/kde-and-ai-and-you-and-me/> – included a timeline of twenty-two events. I participated before the final event:
― The draft proposal was removed and the whole topic hidden.
@grahamperrin it's a blue-moon scenario that i engage in any political/ethical type of conversation.
generally i take a de facto stance of opening my mind to other's viewpoints as i'm not a fan of tunnelvision.
i'm just here to share knowledge, research, and have a good time. i'm finding in the last 10 years even on something decentralized as fediverse it's really tough to have a good time.
remember when we use to just talk about unix and share stories about this or that? me too :-)
Co wam wziąć?
Leszek [singular masculine/masculine animate/animate neutral depending on the grammar of your language] » 🔓
@makdaam@chaos.social
@stfn Mleko skondensowane w tubce.
@michal to już zrobiliby odwrotnie... odbiór awiz, nadawanie listów itp na każdej stacji benzynowej orlenu... brzmi lepiej ;-)
@michal Here's Hannah Frye explaining how fountain pens work, and showing some of her very favorite pens.
"The Intolerable Hypocrisy of Cyberlibertarianism"
Yes, you can share.
| yes: | 19 |
| no: | 8 |
Closed
I am always confusing the standard UI buttons for attachment (paperclip icon) and link (chain icon). Is that a common problem or do I have some sort of visual disability?
Anyone seen workable alternatives to these icons? They seem nearly universal, and yet too visually similar.
@stewf There was also a treatment at some point where this was an issue for me, but maybe I got used to it.
+ is emerging as a new standard to add things, so maybe this would be an alt to attaching.
Alternatively, I would just separate them more or force one into a specific position, so that conflation would be less likely.
Or making linking only appear/get enabled when you have text selected.
@mwichary Maybe you should design UX for a living…
@stewf Oh, also you could replace attach paperclip with some sort of a file icon – like they already do with the Drive icon next door.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen alts to the link for linking, except different visual treatments. (Well, “earth” occasionally, long ago. Would not recommend it.)
How did it handle it? :)
🍵
boosted@michal I can recommend Taxi, if you haven't seen it.
@michal Nope. American sit-com about Taxi drivers in NYC. Danny DeVito, Christopher Lloyd (Doc in Back to the Future), Andy Kaufman.
@michal Oh! I looked this up. A 1998 movie from Luc Besson. I will have to see that, since he's a favorite. Sounds a bit like The Transporter, but should be good even if I can't find subtitles.
Couldn't find a ball player, though.
@michal Everybody wants surveillance, even the EU... I think we're putting them on a too high pedestal. See ChatControl, see age verification etc.
an amazing talk about what dekstops can be
@michal The whole thing was a metaphor, invented by Intergalactic Digital Research, to mimic how people worked in the 70's. It really makes no sense now. If it ever did.
Can't watch at work, but I'll run this when I get home.
"Chapter 4. How to sell your house and start an AI company".
@michal Oh, my. That's my favorite cola brand, and it's almost impossible to find now. Plus I mostly don't drink sodas now (too fat, and sugar won't help). But if I could get some to keep in the fridge for special occasions, I would.
(I'm also finding it hard to get Little Debbie snack cakes. I love the Swiss Cake Rolls, though I'm not sure what the Swiss have to do with it. ;) )
I'm looking for an overview of that Hugging Face hack but without all the anthropomorphization that lots of reporting likes to do..
@michal I'm just interested in the process of the reward hacking (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reward_hacking) rather than all these people just saying "AI really likes to cheat" - it doesn't like to do anything.
I want to be able to explain reward hacking to a layperson, specifically how it might iterate over tasks to find the optimal route.
I guess I could show people MarI/O, a video I usually have shown my students for the past decade:
@Moosader I dunno, I find great amusement in the video I'm currently watching, describing it like a dysfunctional office :v
@michal I've read that this is the problem for many sitcoms. They get interest and anticipation by an unresolved romance. But, sooner or later, you have to resolve it. Which kills the interest. And if you *don't* resolve it, the audience feels cheated.
You can see this handled in different ways by different shows.
@tootbrute@fedi.arkadi.one I think my favorite jazz "album" is the Centennial Trilogy by Chief Adjuah, and I highly recommend a listen 🎺
(Gotta put "album" in quotes because it's actually three: Ruler Rebel, Diaspora, and Emancipation Procrastination)
If you like that ☝️ you should also check out:
I could keep going, but maybe I shouldn't 😅
@bandcamp@piefed.social @music@newsmast.community @jazz@fedigroups.social
#Bandcamp #Music #Jazz
@michal you are fine. I'm tall guy and I can palm a basketball, and I can use a Sport without posting in a pinch. It's just I'm used to weight distributions when posted, it's really comfortable (all my Sports are heavy).
@michal I only have brass and steel Sports, those are wonderfully heavy
Okay. What tech-focused instances are there?
bitbang.social - Action Retro's instance. He used Claude to port Haiku OS to PPC, so it might be more friendly to AgOS than others...
oldbytes.space - I got kicked out already.
tech.lgbt - Ditto
??? - What else is there?
@mos_8502 bitbang is pretty much dead btw, running a 2 year old version of mastodon (without even security updates) and I don’t think it’s accepting signups
Today is Cow Mug Appreciation Day. Every year, my wife and I celebrate cow mug.
Yes, we need to get out more....
@thomasadam get out more to get more cow mugs and crocheting stufff? 😂 (cool cushions on the seats btw :)
@thomasadam
Is that a proper stereo I see in the background? Which reel-to-reel tape recorder is that? You are either dating yourself or you are a millennial with great retro aspirations!
@michaelgalassi Heh. It is. The reel-to-reel is an Akai GX-270D. Very capable machine.
@thomasadam Very nice! In the day I would have LOVED something like that or a Revox. I had a Uher Report 4200 which I was able to sneak into several concerts in the late 70s and early 80s when I lived overseas. Somewhere are 5" spools with Ray Charles, Edoardo Bennato, The Ramones, UK Subs, Fabrizio DeAndre, Neil Young, and others. Sadly time has relegated them all to some unknown repository :-(.
@michal A glorified CD player these days...
@michal Yes it is -- it's also a very decent bookshelf-sized amplifier with a decent number of outputs.
@michal @thomasadam In which case, since it can function as an amp as well as a CD player, it might be a good one for you if you wanted something like that. Other CD players are available though.
@michal @thomasadam I think that’s an accurate description, yes. I rather like the sound. Not too bassey or booming, of that makes sense?
"I believe that AI could cure most major diseases in the next 5–10 years". Is the author sane?
| Yes: | 24 |
| No: | 424 |
@bert_hubert I regret voting yes. Did that because I'd say those are sane and liars. Misunderstood the question. 🤣
@bert_hubert, what is the source? It would be interesting to learn more about your assessment, and how sanity is defined here (or how the label helps).
@bert_hubert well.... It might put more effort in than the government ever did on post acute infection diseases (LongCovid, ME, Lyme, post sepsis, Qfever etc) 🫣
@bert_hubert it depends on the meaning “major diseases”. Flu: vaccine; gastrointestinal: the usual things; high pressure: well known medications, etc. But if they include cancer (which it is a major disease, if we consider it as one disease): well no. We know very well the cures on most of the major diseases.
@bert_hubert.. It could, if its owners would provide it to researchers doing data-heavy pattern recognition research. However, this will not happen, considering these owners provide server capacity to the highest bidder instead of the best cause.
@bert_hubert it is well on the way to *diagnosing* most diseases, anyway. https://mastodon.social/@hyc/117036731217520564
Rethinking EEG-Based Disease Diagnosis: Decoupling Instance Representation Learning from Subject-Level Supervision
EEG-based disease diagnosis requires one prediction per subject, yet common pipelines segment recordings into short instances...
We propose BridgeMIL (Multiple Instance Learning), a two-stage framework that decouples instance representation learning from subject-level supervision
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.27274v2
Built on #LMDB